Pittbsurgh's day in the sun

According to a recent article in the Post-Gazette, Pittsburgh is going to be emphasizing alternative energy in an effort to become an alternative-energy powerhouse. The only issue? The alternative energy we're trying to harness is solar power.

Is it just me, or does this seem a bit backward? According to weather data, Pittsburgh is the 19th-cloudiest city in the United States, with an average of 203 cloudy days a year - not including days that are only partly cloudy. And even though the city is one of 25 Solar America Cities, a distinction that makes it available for a $200,000 grant for the development and implementation of solar infrastructure, even the article notes that the city was awarded the title because "the city's enthusiasm shines brightly." Not because we have the best sun, but because our attitude is good. If only solar power was powered by hopes and dreams, we'd be golden.

It's true that direct sun isn't absolutely necessary for solar power, but it still seems like this proposal is a little misdirected. Maybe wind power would be a better choice, given Pittsburgh's high hills and our general lack of most other renewable resources. But if enthusiasm is enough to warrant a government grant, then hey, go for it. Maybe I'll be enthusiastic about solar power and get a grant too.